Tag Archives: James Starks
Star Ratings: Texans-Packers
I said all week, “If you can’t beat Texans at home, you’re not a playoff team.” That’s how people should have looked at this Houston Texans-Green Bay Packer game. It was a true test to see if Packers could do their job and handle business
SnoTap Packers Preview: Houston v. Green Bay
Game two of the playoffs starts at noon at Lambeau Field where it will be Packers weather as the cliche term goes with highs in the 30’s and the tundra beginning its hibernation process. Green Bay Packers welcome Houston Texans to town for their first
Star Ratings: Green Bay vs. Philadelphia
Green Bay Packers needed a win on Monday night in Philadelphia. If Packers lost Monday’s game, they would be 4-7 and the season would be practically over. And now that they’ve won, Packers are right back into the mix with the NFC North race and
Christine Michael’s Green Bay Impact
Green Bay Packers listened to what we wrote about on Wednesday morning. I made a plea to Ted Thompson to claim Seattle Seahwks running back Christine Michael before Minnesota or Detroit did. This ended up getting some pub on 105.7FM The Fan yesterday morning, shouts
Starks and Cook Would Be Huge Lift To Packers Offense
Reports came out yesterday that running back James Starks and tight end Jared Cook were full participants in practice. That’s great news for Packers offense which has seen its ups and downs in the past couple weeks. To get two capable starters back in the
Eddie Lacy Sounds Like He Won’t Miss Time
Per ESPN’s Rob Demovsky, some good injury news from Packers yesterday regarding Eddie Lacy. He practiced quite a bit on that ankle yesterday, and it seems like he’s more probable even though that’s not a thing anymore than questionable. James Starks missed practice with a
Star Ratings: Giants-Packers
This is star ratings. A good way to break down which Packers played the best or the worst on Sunday. Let’s get into Green Bay’s 23-16 win versus New York. Five Stars Packers Offensive Line – It’s hard to give it to one guy, but